This ontology provides a description of the data lifecycle for e-research in social sciences and humanities.
The purpose of the E-research in the Social Sciences and Humanities Domain-specific Meta-Model is to provide a set of concrete entities, agents, activities, and roles to represent the data engineering process. It is based on the general Data Lifecycle Ontology.
This ontology imports the W3C PROV ontology available at http://www.w3c.org/TR/prov-o/. It is derived from the Data Lifecycle Ontology available at http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/dlo.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Activity
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#ActivityInfluence
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Agent
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#AgentInfluence
It is not recommended that the type AgentInfluence be asserted without also asserting one of its more specific subclasses.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Association
An instance of prov:Association provides additional descriptions about the binary prov:wasAssociatedWith relation from an prov:Activity to some prov:Agent that had some responsiblity for it. For example, :baking prov:wasAssociatedWith :baker; prov:qualifiedAssociation [ a prov:Association; prov:agent :baker; :foo :bar ].
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Attribution
An instance of prov:Attribution provides additional descriptions about the binary prov:wasAttributedTo relation from an prov:Entity to some prov:Agent that had some responsible for it. For example, :cake prov:wasAttributedTo :baker; prov:qualifiedAttribution [ a prov:Attribution; prov:entity :baker; :foo :bar ].
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/dlo#Authoring
The LOD2 Stack facilitates the authoring of rich semantic knowledge bases, by leveraging Semantic Wiki technology, the WYSIWYM paradigm (What You See Is What You Mean) and distributed social, semantic collaboration
and networking techniques.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Bundle
Note that there are kinds of bundles (e.g. handwritten letters, audio recordings, etc.) that are not expressed in PROV-O, but can be still be described by PROV-O.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/sdo#Candidate
A dataset which is potentially going to be included into the database.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/dlo#Classification
Linked Data on the Web is mainly raw instance data. For data integration, fusion, search and many other applications, however, we need this raw instance data to be classified into taxonomies. In the LOD2 stack, semi-automatic components for this purpose are included.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Collection
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Communication
An instance of prov:Communication provides additional descriptions about the binary prov:wasInformedBy relation from an informed prov:Activity to the prov:Activity that informed it. For example, :you_jumping_off_bridge prov:wasInformedBy :everyone_else_jumping_off_bridge; prov:qualifiedCommunication [ a prov:Communication; prov:activity :everyone_else_jumping_off_bridge; :foo :bar ].
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/sdo#Consumer
A person or software agent who consumes data from the system.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/sdo#Creation
Input of new data through a human (e.g. user/domain expert) or machine (e.g. sensor) source.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/dlo#DataArchitect
A Data Architect is an increasingly important role. It is a natural evolution from Data Analyst and Database Designer, and reflects the emergence. of Internet Web Sites which need to integrate data from different unrelated Data Sources.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/sdo#DataCollection
Automatic or semi-automatic input of new data (e.g. through a harvester).
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/dlo#DataEngineer
Data engineers are the designers, builders and managers of an information infrastructure. They develop the architecture that helps analyze and process data in the way the organization needs it. And they make sure those systems are performing smoothly. Data science is a team sport.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/dlo#DataProcessRole
A general role class for roles in the data processing lifecycle.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/dlo#DataSource
A data source defines where data comes from.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Delegation
An instance of prov:Delegation provides additional descriptions about the binary prov:actedOnBehalfOf relation from a performing prov:Agent to some prov:Agent for whom it was performed. For example, :mixing prov:wasAssociatedWith :toddler . :toddler prov:actedOnBehalfOf :mother; prov:qualifiedDelegation [ a prov:Delegation; prov:entity :mother; :foo :bar ].
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Derivation
An instance of prov:Derivation provides additional descriptions about the binary prov:wasDerivedFrom relation from some derived prov:Entity to another prov:Entity from which it was derived. For example, :chewed_bubble_gum prov:wasDerivedFrom :unwrapped_bubble_gum; prov:qualifiedDerivation [ a prov:Derivation; prov:entity :unwrapped_bubble_gum; :foo :bar ].
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/dlo#DomainExpert
A person who is an authority in a particular area or topic. The term domain expert is frequently used in expert systems software development, and there the term always refers to the domain other than the software domain.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/sdo#Elaboration
Addition of new information to already existing data.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#EmptyCollection
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#End
An instance of prov:End provides additional descriptions about the binary prov:wasEndedBy relation from some ended prov:Activity to an prov:Entity that ended it. For example, :ball_game prov:wasEndedBy :buzzer; prov:qualifiedEnd [ a prov:End; prov:entity :buzzer; :foo :bar; prov:atTime '2012-03-09T08:05:08-05:00'^^xsd:dateTime ].
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Entity
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#EntityInfluence
EntityInfluence provides additional descriptions of an Entity's binary influence upon any other kind of resource. Instances of EntityInfluence use the prov:entity property to cite the influencing Entity.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/dlo#Evolution
Data on the Web is dynamic. We need to facilitate the evolution of data while
keeping things stable. Changes and modifications to knowledge bases, vocabularies and ontologies should be transparent and observable.
The LOD2 Stack comprises methods to spot problems in knowledge bases and to automatically suggest repair strategies.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/sdo#Extraction
Gathering of specific information from structured data sources.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/sdo#Filtering
Selection of specific information out of a large data set or data base.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Generation
An instance of prov:Generation provides additional descriptions about the binary prov:wasGeneratedBy relation from a generated prov:Entity to the prov:Activity that generated it. For example, :cake prov:wasGeneratedBy :baking; prov:qualifiedGeneration [ a prov:Generation; prov:activity :baking; :foo :bar ].
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/sdo#HTML
An HTML resource (e.g. a Website).
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Influence
An instance of prov:Influence provides additional descriptions about the binary prov:wasInfluencedBy relation from some influenced Activity, Entity, or Agent to the influencing Activity, Entity, or Agent. For example, :stomach_ache prov:wasInfluencedBy :spoon; prov:qualifiedInfluence [ a prov:Influence; prov:entity :spoon; :foo :bar ] . Because prov:Influence is a broad relation, the more specific relations (Communication, Delegation, End, etc.) should be used when applicable.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#InstantaneousEvent
An instantaneous event, or event for short, happens in the world and marks a change in the world, in its activities and in its entities. The term 'event' is commonly used in process algebra with a similar meaning. Events represent communications or interactions; they are assumed to be atomic and instantaneous.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/dlo#Interlinking
Creating and maintaining links in a (semi-)automated fashion is still a major challenge and crucial for establishing coherence and facilitating data integration as outlined in the publishing usage scenario in the introduction. We seek linking approaches yielding high precision and recall, which configure themselves automatically or with end-user feedback.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/sdo#Interpretation
The way a dataset is actually saved into the system (also includes the format).
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Invalidation
An instance of prov:Invalidation provides additional descriptions about the binary prov:wasInvalidatedBy relation from an invalidated prov:Entity to the prov:Activity that invalidated it. For example, :uncracked_egg prov:wasInvalidatedBy :baking; prov:qualifiedInvalidation [ a prov:Invalidation; prov:activity :baking; :foo :bar ].
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/sdo#JStore
jQuery based client-side storage management.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Location
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/sdo#Merging
Putting data from different sources and/or from spanning different but overlapping knowledge together.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/sdo#MetaReport
Data about a certain report.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Organization
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Person
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Plan
There exist no prescriptive requirement on the nature of plans, their representation, the actions or steps they consist of, or their intended goals. Since plans may evolve over time, it may become necessary to track their provenance, so plans themselves are entities. Representing the plan explicitly in the provenance can be useful for various tasks: for example, to validate the execution as represented in the provenance record, to manage expectation failures, or to provide explanations.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/sdo#Prefiltering
Preparation for filtering in the case the data set is too big to be filtered in one single step.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#PrimarySource
An instance of prov:PrimarySource provides additional descriptions about the binary prov:hadPrimarySource relation from some secondary prov:Entity to an earlier, primary prov:Entity. For example, :blog prov:hadPrimarySource :newsArticle; prov:qualifiedPrimarySource [ a prov:PrimarySource; prov:entity :newsArticle; :foo :bar ] .
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/dlo#Process
A general class for describing specific steps during the processing of linked data.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/sdo#Processor
A person or software agent who changes data in the system.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/sdo#Producer
A person or software agent who produces new data and provides them to the system.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/sdo#Publishing
Publishing of data on the Web in a structured format.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/dlo#Quality
The quality of content on the Data Web varies, as the quality of content on the document web varies. The LOD2 Stack comprises techniques for assessing quality based on characteristics such as provenance, context, coverage or structure. The goal in our application scenarios is
to assess whether data sources for a publisher are
complete, consistent, reliable etc.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/sdo#Querying
Sending queries to a database and retrieving results based on the query criteria.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Quotation
An instance of prov:Quotation provides additional descriptions about the binary prov:wasQuotedFrom relation from some taken prov:Entity from an earlier, larger prov:Entity. For example, :here_is_looking_at_you_kid prov:wasQuotedFrom :casablanca_script; prov:qualifiedQuotation [ a prov:Quotation; prov:entity :casablanca_script; :foo :bar ].
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/sdo#Report
A dataset actually included into the database.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/dlo#Repository
A central location in which data is stored and managed.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/sdo#Revision
Improvement of quality of data through a user.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Revision
An instance of prov:Revision provides additional descriptions about the binary prov:wasRevisionOf relation from some newer prov:Entity to an earlier prov:Entity. For example, :draft_2 prov:wasRevisionOf :draft_1; prov:qualifiedRevision [ a prov:Revision; prov:entity :draft_1; :foo :bar ].
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Role
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/dlo#Search
For many users, the Data Web is still invisible below the surface. LOD2 develops search, browsing, exploration and visualization techniques for different kinds of Linked Data (i.e. spatial, temporal, statistical), which make the Data Web sensible for real users.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#SoftwareAgent
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Start
An instance of prov:Start provides additional descriptions about the binary prov:wasStartedBy relation from some started prov:Activity to an prov:Entity that started it. For example, :foot_race prov:wasStartedBy :bang; prov:qualifiedStart [ a prov:Start; prov:entity :bang; :foo :bar; prov:atTime '2012-03-09T08:05:08-05:00'^^xsd:dateTime ] .
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/dlo#Storage
Efficient RDF data management techniques fulfilling requirements of global publishers comprise column-store technology, dynamic query optimization, adaptive caching of joins, optimized graph processing and cluster/cloud
scalability.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/dlo#SystemAdministrator
A person who is responsible for managing the data engineering system.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/sdo#Updating
Adding new information or modifying existing data.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Usage
An instance of prov:Usage provides additional descriptions about the binary prov:used relation from some prov:Activity to an prov:Entity that it used. For example, :keynote prov:used :podium; prov:qualifiedUsage [ a prov:Usage; prov:entity :podium; :foo :bar ].
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#actedOnBehalfOf
An object property to express the accountability of an agent towards another agent. The subordinate agent acted on behalf of the responsible agent in an actual activity.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#activity
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#agent
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#alternateOf
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#atLocation
The Location of any resource.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/dlo#consumes
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#entity
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#generated
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#hadActivity
The _optional_ Activity of an Influence, which used, generated, invalidated, or was the responsibility of some Entity. This property is _not_ used by ActivityInfluence (use prov:activity instead).
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#hadGeneration
The _optional_ Generation involved in an Entity's Derivation.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#hadMember
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#hadPlan
The _optional_ Plan adopted by an Agent in Association with some Activity. Plan specifications are out of the scope of this specification.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#hadPrimarySource
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#hadRole
The _optional_ Role that an Entity assumed in the context of an Activity. For example, :baking prov:used :spoon; prov:qualified [ a prov:Usage; prov:entity :spoon; prov:hadRole roles:mixing_implement ].
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#hadUsage
The _optional_ Usage involved in an Entity's Derivation.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/dlo#hasRole
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/dlo#hasStage
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#influenced
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#influencer
Subproperties of prov:influencer are used to cite the object of an unqualified PROV-O triple whose predicate is a subproperty of prov:wasInfluencedBy (e.g. prov:used, prov:wasGeneratedBy). prov:influencer is used much like rdf:object is used.
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/dlo#initiates
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#invalidated
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/dlo#isResponsibleFor
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/dlo#isSupportedBy
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#qualifiedAssociation
If this Activity prov:wasAssociatedWith Agent :ag, then it can qualify the Association using prov:qualifiedAssociation [ a prov:Association; prov:agent :ag; :foo :bar ].
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#qualifiedAttribution
If this Entity prov:wasAttributedTo Agent :ag, then it can qualify how it was influenced using prov:qualifiedAttribution [ a prov:Attribution; prov:agent :ag; :foo :bar ].
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#qualifiedCommunication
If this Activity prov:wasInformedBy Activity :a, then it can qualify how it was influenced using prov:qualifiedCommunication [ a prov:Communication; prov:activity :a; :foo :bar ].
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#qualifiedDelegation
If this Agent prov:actedOnBehalfOf Agent :ag, then it can qualify how with prov:qualifiedResponsibility [ a prov:Responsibility; prov:agent :ag; :foo :bar ].
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#qualifiedDerivation
If this Entity prov:wasDerivedFrom Entity :e, then it can qualify how it was derived using prov:qualifiedDerivation [ a prov:Derivation; prov:entity :e; :foo :bar ].
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#qualifiedEnd
If this Activity prov:wasEndedBy Entity :e1, then it can qualify how it was ended using prov:qualifiedEnd [ a prov:End; prov:entity :e1; :foo :bar ].
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#qualifiedGeneration
If this Activity prov:generated Entity :e, then it can qualify how it performed the Generation using prov:qualifiedGeneration [ a prov:Generation; prov:entity :e; :foo :bar ].
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#qualifiedInfluence
Because prov:qualifiedInfluence is a broad relation, the more specific relations (qualifiedCommunication, qualifiedDelegation, qualifiedEnd, etc.) should be used when applicable.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#qualifiedInvalidation
If this Entity prov:wasInvalidatedBy Activity :a, then it can qualify how it was invalidated using prov:qualifiedInvalidation [ a prov:Invalidation; prov:activity :a; :foo :bar ].
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#qualifiedPrimarySource
If this Entity prov:hadPrimarySource Entity :e, then it can qualify how using prov:qualifiedPrimarySource [ a prov:PrimarySource; prov:entity :e; :foo :bar ].
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#qualifiedQuotation
If this Entity prov:wasQuotedFrom Entity :e, then it can qualify how using prov:qualifiedQuotation [ a prov:Quotation; prov:entity :e; :foo :bar ].
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#qualifiedRevision
If this Entity prov:wasRevisionOf Entity :e, then it can qualify how it was revised using prov:qualifiedRevision [ a prov:Revision; prov:entity :e; :foo :bar ].
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#qualifiedStart
If this Activity prov:wasStartedBy Entity :e1, then it can qualify how it was started using prov:qualifiedStart [ a prov:Start; prov:entity :e1; :foo :bar ].
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#qualifiedUsage
If this Activity prov:used Entity :e, then it can qualify how it used it using prov:qualifiedUsage [ a prov:Usage; prov:entity :e; :foo :bar ].
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#specializationOf
IRI: http://aligned-project.eu/ontologies/dlo#supports
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#used
A prov:Entity that was used by this prov:Activity. For example, :baking prov:used :spoon, :egg, :oven .
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasAssociatedWith
An prov:Agent that had some (unspecified) responsibility for the occurrence of this prov:Activity.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasAttributedTo
Attribution is the ascribing of an entity to an agent.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
The more specific subproperties of prov:wasDerivedFrom (i.e., prov:wasQuotedFrom, prov:wasRevisionOf, prov:hadPrimarySource) should be used when applicable.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasEndedBy
End is when an activity is deemed to have ended. An end may refer to an entity, known as trigger, that terminated the activity.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasGeneratedBy
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasInfluencedBy
Because prov:wasInfluencedBy is a broad relation, its more specific subproperties (e.g. prov:wasInformedBy, prov:actedOnBehalfOf, prov:wasEndedBy, etc.) should be used when applicable.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasInformedBy
An activity a2 is dependent on or informed by another activity a1, by way of some unspecified entity that is generated by a1 and used by a2.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasInvalidatedBy
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom
An entity is derived from an original entity by copying, or 'quoting', some or all of it.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasRevisionOf
A revision is a derivation that revises an entity into a revised version.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasStartedBy
Start is when an activity is deemed to have started. A start may refer to an entity, known as trigger, that initiated the activity.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#atTime
The time at which an InstantaneousEvent occurred, in the form of xsd:dateTime.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#endedAtTime
The time at which an activity ended. See also prov:startedAtTime.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#generatedAtTime
The time at which an entity was completely created and is available for use.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#invalidatedAtTime
The time at which an entity was invalidated (i.e., no longer usable).
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#startedAtTime
The time at which an activity started. See also prov:endedAtTime.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#aq
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#category
Classify prov-o terms into three categories, including 'starting-point', 'qualifed', and 'extended'. This classification is used by the prov-o html document to gently introduce prov-o terms to its users.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#component
Classify prov-o terms into six components according to prov-dm, including 'agents-responsibility', 'alternate', 'annotations', 'collections', 'derivations', and 'entities-activities'. This classification is used so that readers of prov-o specification can find its correspondence with the prov-dm specification.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#constraints
A reference to the principal section of the PROV-CONSTRAINTS document that describes this concept.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#definition
A definition quoted from PROV-DM or PROV-CONSTRAINTS that describes the concept expressed with this OWL term.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#dm
A reference to the principal section of the PROV-DM document that describes this concept.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#editorialNote
A note by the OWL development team about how this term expresses the PROV-DM concept, or how it should be used in context of semantic web or linked data.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#editorsDefinition
When the prov-o term does not have a definition drawn from prov-dm, and the prov-o editor provides one.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#inverse
PROV-O does not define all property inverses. The directionalities defined in PROV-O should be given preference over those not defined. However, if users wish to name the inverse of a PROV-O property, the local name given by prov:inverse should be used.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy
IRI: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#n
A reference to the principal section of the PROV-DM document that describes this concept.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#order
The position that this OWL term should be listed within documentation. The scope of the documentation (e.g., among all terms, among terms within a prov:category, among properties applying to a particular class, etc.) is unspecified.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#qualifiedForm
This annotation property links a subproperty of prov:wasInfluencedBy with the subclass of prov:Influence and the qualifying property that are used to qualify it.
Example annotation:
prov:wasGeneratedBy prov:qualifiedForm prov:qualifiedGeneration, prov:Generation .
Then this unqualified assertion:
:entity1 prov:wasGeneratedBy :activity1 .
can be qualified by adding:
:entity1 prov:qualifiedGeneration :entity1Gen .
:entity1Gen
a prov:Generation, prov:Influence;
prov:activity :activity1;
:customValue 1337 .
Note how the value of the unqualified influence (prov:wasGeneratedBy :activity1) is mirrored as the value of the prov:activity (or prov:entity, or prov:agent) property on the influence class.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#seeAlso
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#sharesDefinitionWith
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#specializationOf
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#unqualifiedForm
Classes and properties used to qualify relationships are annotated with prov:unqualifiedForm to indicate the property used to assert an unqualified provenance relation.
IRI: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasRevisionOf
A revision is a derivation that revises an entity into a revised version.
This HTML document was obtained by processing the OWL ontology source code through LODE, Live OWL Documentation Environment, developed by Silvio Peroni.
ActivityInfluence provides additional descriptions of an Activity's binary influence upon any other kind of resource. Instances of ActivityInfluence use the prov:activity property to cite the influencing Activity.